Senior Leaders and Honest Feedback
Why This Matters
Silence kills performance. Leaders need real information to make decisions and grow.
Leaders talk about the value of feedback. Yet the people closest to them hesitate to offer it. I see this in every organization I coach; it’s a reality of organizational dynamics. Direct reports withhold insight. They worry how feedback will land. They avoid discomfort. Leaders assume silence means alignment. It does not.
Silence kills performance. Leaders need real information to make decisions and grow. Research from CCL shows that self-awareness drops as leaders rise. Korn Ferry reports that senior executives are often rated lower on seeking feedback than managers. Studies from Google’s Project Aristotle highlight that psychological safety predicts team performance, and candor is a key behavior.
Some leaders default to anonymous surveys. That can help early on, but anonymous feedback alone reinforces the belief that truth needs protection. The goal is an environment where feedback is safe, useful, and routine.
Why Feedback Declines at Senior Levels
Power distance grows and people default to safety.
Past reactions condition employees to avoid candor.
Leaders rely on a small inner circle for input.
Team members lack skill in giving useful feedback.
Anonymous surveys reinforce fear rather than reduce it.
Evidence From Organizations
CCL studies show self-awareness erodes when feedback shrinks.
Korn Ferry research finds leaders often overestimate their openness.
Google’s Project Aristotle links team performance to psychological safety.
Gallup reports employees stay silent when they believe candor leads to risk.
What Senior Leaders Can Do
Ask for specific feedback
Prompt for one behavior in a concrete situation.
Frame the request: "What’s one thing I could have done better in that meeting?"
Signal what you want to learn, not defend.
Invite feedback after decisions and key milestones.
Respond constructively
Pause before speaking.
Maintain neutral posture and tone.
Acknowledge the input: "I hear you."
Ask clarifying questions about impact.
Share what you will reflect on and when you will follow up.
Act visibly on feedback
Identify a small improvement and implement it quickly.
Tell the team what you changed and why.
Reinforce the link between candor and improved decisions.
If appropriate, thank people publicly for specific constructive input.
Build systems that reduce fear
Create shared norms for how feedback works here.
Add structured upward feedback in performance cycles.
Initially, if needed, use external coaches to gather themes confidentially.
Model vulnerability in leadership meetings.
Leader Self Assessment: Seeking and Applying Feedback
Rate each item: Never, Sometimes, Often, Always.
| Practice Area | Behavior | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Seeking feedback | I ask for feedback at least weekly. |
|
| I request feedback tied to recent behaviors. |
|
|
| I ask more than one stakeholder for input. |
|
|
| I communicate how I will use the feedback. |
|
|
| I follow up to gather deeper insight. |
|
|
| Receiving feedback | I pause and listen without interrupting. |
|
| I manage my nonverbal reactions. |
|
|
| I avoid explaining or defending myself right away. |
|
|
| I restate what I heard to check understanding. |
|
|
| I thank the person for their honesty and effort. |
|
|
| Applying feedback | I act on at least one constructive suggestion. |
|
| I communicate the change I made. |
|
|
| I ask for follow up feedback. |
|
|
| I reinforce safety when people speak up. |
|
|
| I review results and adjust behavior based on what I learn. |
|
Interpreting Your Responses
• Mostly Always: You signal openness that encourages candor.
• Mostly Often: Strong foundation, refine consistency.
• Mostly Sometimes: Inconsistent behaviors limit reliable feedback.
• Mostly Never: Power dynamics likely suppress feedback.
Possible Action Plan
Step 1: Identify top three behaviors to improve.
Step 2: Define specific actions you will take in the next 30 days.
Step 3: Select and ask 3 direct reports to give you feedback monthly.
Step 4: Record feedback themes and patterns.
Step 5: Review progress quarterly and adjust behaviors.
References
Center for Creative Leadership. (2020). Feedback for leadership effectiveness: Trends and implications.
Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace. Wiley.
Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace report.
Huang, L., Wellman, N., Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Wang, L. (2024). Seeking feedback in high power‑distance cultures: Leader behaviors and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1512075.
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2024). A meta‑analysis of psychological safety and voice behavior at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 259‑287.
Rosen, C. C., Koopman, J., Johnson, R. E., & Biggs, A. (2025). Context matters in feedback effectiveness: A systematic review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 12, 311‑345.
Rozovsky, J. (2015). Project Aristotle: Understanding team effectiveness at Google. Google People Analytics.